As an employer what is the best way to deal with an employee whom you believe no longer has a place in your organisation?

As an employer what is the best way to deal with an employee whom you believe no longer has a place in your organisation?

This has been an increasingly popular query we have been presented with in the last two years. Although it has little to do with the bookkeeping services we offer, it has become one which we usually address under the office administration or business management umbrella.

There is a moral answer to this as well as the legal one. What is unusual is that they both agree in principle: you should treat the employee fairly and reasonably.

This can best be done by putting yourself in the shoes of the employee you are asking the above question about, treating them the way you would want to be dealt with in their situation.

This does not mean you should forgive and forget if an employee commits gross misconduct such as theft. It just means you deal with them with fairly and reasonably.

Taking the theft example: you do not dismiss them on the spot or drag them down to the local police station; these actions will only assuage your immediate feelings and thoughts as an individual. As an employer, they fall far short.

Dealing with an employee whom you feel no longer has a place in your organisation should not be a win / lose situation (all too often this table can be turned and you can find yourself with the lose ticket) but should be approached, through mediation and diplomacy, seeking a win / win scenario where all parties agree to a common conclusion.

Back to the theft scenario, this is one of the most serious reasons for removing an employee from your organisation. Would you find it acceptable not to be given an opportunity to explain yourself, or be sacked on the spot maybe in front of colleagues and friends? Or would you prefer to be told about the alleged incident in private, be given a defined procedure which will allow you to be treated fairly and invited to a private meeting to discuss your employment?

Probably the latter, even if you have committed serious misconduct and are being charged with theft.

Even employees with less than a year’s employment and even if still in their probationary period will need to be treated fairly and reasonably. You cannot dismiss an individual because as an employer, you no longer wish them to work for you.

Open a formal dialogue, structure your meetings and make sure you behave fairly and reasonably.

It is fair and reasonable to point out to an employee that their theft makes their position untenable and to treat them with dignity and respect by giving them an opportunity to explain their actions and acknowledge their mistake. They may even agree with you that they can no longer be an employee of your company.

It is not fair or reasonable to dismiss an employee 11 months into their employment as soon as they walk through the door just because that’s what you want to do. Morally and legally this is wrong and quite often has very unpleasant legal and personal repercussions.

The best guide for an employer to act fairly and reasonably is to have a Grievance and Disciplinary Procedure in place, for employer and employees to adhere to.

With many years of experience in office management roles, we can help you draw up this and other types of procedures, so that you will be less exposed to the moral or legal repercussions than employers who have less skills and experience, and do not have adequate systems in place.

Posted in Business Growth, Tips | Comments Off on As an employer what is the best way to deal with an employee whom you believe no longer has a place in your organisation?

Auto Enrolement Pensions For Employees

The Government is pushing ahead with plans to force small firms to auto-enrol all employees into a pension scheme, but only those employees earning more than £7,500 will be included.

Announcing the findings of a review into auto-enrolment, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed that every UK company will have to offer a pension scheme from 2012. Those employers not offering their own scheme will be compelled to use the new National Employment Savings Trust (Nest).
The decision comes despite warnings from small business lobby groups that those firms employing fewer than 10 staff would be unduly burdened by any auto-enrolment scheme.
The DWP has, however, made some concessions to employers, with firms to be given 12 weeks’ grace before staff are automatically enrolled, to ease the burden on those employing large numbers of temporary workers.
In addition, Nest will not force anyone earning below the £7,500 PAYE threshold to enrol but will allow those on a percentage earnings band between £5,000 and £7,500 to opt in. The 2008 Pensions Act had suggested auto-enrolling all staff earning £5,035 or more.

Many thanks to Daniel Thomas of Personnel Today for this article.

Posted in Business Growth, Tips | Comments Off on Auto Enrolement Pensions For Employees

Revision of equality law in the provision of goods and services.

My thanks to Business Gateway for the updates on this legalisation.

Relevant to
Any business that provides goods, services and/or access to facilities to the public

Takes effect on
1 October 2010

From 1 October 2010, most of the Equality Act 2010 will come into force. The Act replaces the existing anti-discrimination legislation, such as the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

The 2010 Act will remove inconsistencies and introduce greater protections for some groups of people. However, as long as you treat everyone who accesses your goods, facilities or services fairly, you shouldn’t have to make any major changes to the way your business operates.

Protected characteristics
You must not discriminate against people who access your goods, facilities or services on the basis of a ‘protected characteristic’. The relevant characteristics are:

disability
gender reassignment, which covers transsexual people
pregnancy and maternity
race, which includes ethnic or national origins, colour and nationality
religion or belief
sex
sexual orientation
Age will continue not to be covered for the time being.

Apart from cases of pregnancy and maternity, people will be protected even if they do not possess the characteristic themselves, eg where a person is treated unfavourably because they are:

associated or connected with someone else who has a particular protected characteristic
wrongly thought to have a particular protected characteristic
Disability discrimination
Disabled people will be protected from indirect discrimination. This means that it will be unlawful to have a policy which applies to everyone but particularly disadvantages disabled people.

However, you may be able to justify indirect discrimination if you can show it’s a proportionate way of achieving a legitimate aim.

The Act also introduces protection from “discrimination arising from disability”, which occurs when a disabled person is treated unfavourably because of something connected to their disability, eg their use of a guide dog.

Disability harassment
The Act will extend protection against harassment to disabled people in the provision of goods, facilities and services.

Harassment is defined as conduct that has the purpose or effect of:

violating a person’s dignity, or
creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for them
Breastfeeding mothers
From 1 October 2010, the law will make it clear that you must not discriminate against women outside work just because they are breastfeeding, regardless of the age of the child.

Associations (including private clubs)
An association with 25 or more members and whose membership is controlled by rules, eg a golf club, will no longer be able to treat members less favourably because of sex, religion and belief, pregnancy and maternity, and gender reassignment.

Gender reassignment
A transsexual person will be protected even if they are not under medical supervision. In addition, transsexual people will be protected from indirect discrimination.

Posted in Business Growth | Comments Off on Revision of equality law in the provision of goods and services.